Posts Tagged ‘everglades restoration’

South Florida Everglades Bass Fishing, the L-67A Canal, Falls Victim to Environmentalists

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

By Tim Elfrink , published: June 04, 200
Rick Persson founded a group to save the canals.
Rick Persson founded a group to save the canals.

Iron wires dangle from a boat in a cool brown river deep in the Everglades. On this breezy April morning, a few hundred volts crackle through the metal strands into the water.

Barron Moody sweeps a net through the murk and pulls up six bass stunned by the electricity. The fish shimmy side to side in slow confusion, their wet scales refracting yellow and blue in the sun. Moody tosses them into a half-full holding pool.

“It’s unbelievable, right?” says Moody, a grinning middle-aged man deeply tanned by his daily toil in the Florida sun.

Moody is a biologist from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and it’s his job to keep an eye on the birds, gators, and bass that live in the River of Grass.

In a few hours, Moody will count the fish in his boat before returning them to the canal. A few years ago, his colleagues found 8,000 fish in one stretch of this 26-mile canal that begins where Griffin Road ends west of Davie. Fishermen were hooking almost two bass per hour.

You may not know it by its name, but the L-67A Canal is one of the best fishing holes on planet Earth. From its starting point in Broward County, the canal stretches south through Miami-Dade County and dumps out into the nothingness of the Everglades. Every weekend, locals and tourists haul boats here to float over the cattail-choked culverts and reel in big bass.

But it may not survive the next generation. If Everglades restoration projects go forward as planned, this canal will be backfilled with dirt.

“It’s a shame,” says Rick Persson, a retired Miami Beach firefighter leaning on the wheel of his sleek boat. He smiles at Moody’s bounty of fish. “Kids now won’t be able to enjoy this when they’re my age.”

Persson has fished the L-67A for more than 30 years. He used to hop in a pickup with his dad every weekend, hitch up a rusty old sloop, and drive home nine hours later sunburned and stocked with bass dinners for the week.

“When I started coming out here in the ’70s with a johnboat and a ten-horsepower motor, the canals were totally clear,” Persson says. “No one had quite caught on to how good the fishing was.”

Now that he’s retired, Persson travels the country to fish in big-money tournaments. Whenever he’s home, he drags his new yellow-and-black Skeeter bass boat to the waters where he caught the fishing bug. And most days, he ends up with a better haul than at all the more famous lakes and rivers he visits on the road.

As environmentalists absorb the biggest infusion of cash in a decade from the federal government and celebrate an historic half-billion dollar land-buy from U.S. Sugar, Persson and like-minded activists around the Glades are raising concerns about whether restoration will accomplish anything.

In a larger sense, they’re just writing the latest chapter in a centuries-old struggle between man and nature, a battle that humans decisively won in the 20th Century before we realized the cost of our victory.

In its natural state, the Everglades wasn’t a swamp but a massive, molasses-slow river. All the water in the Kissimmee Valley poured into Lake Okeechobee. From the vast shallow pool, water seeped south across millions of acres of muck.

The solution for how to fix this mess of a wasteland seemed easy: dam up Lake Okeechobee and build canals to shunt its waters east and west to the Gulf and the Atlantic. A long list of famous men went broke or died trying to make this work. Hamilton Disston dredged the first ditches in the late 1800s but died without seeing a profit from his enterprises. Henry Flagler, the oil magnate and father of South Florida, ultimately declared even his massive fortune insufficient to battle the Glades. And Napoleon Bonaparte Broward, the fiery, floppy-mustached governor, died from gallstones before his dream was realized.

Laying out all the American hubris toward the Glades, Broward once said: “Yes, the Everglades is a swamp. So was Chicago 60 years ago.”

Eventually, the Army Corps of Engineers dammed the lake, dredged miles of channels, and reclaimed hundreds of thousands of acres of swampland.

Of course, it didn’t take long for the corps’ success to lead to killer fires, dust bowls, and saltwater-infested groundwater from Boca to Miami. Until last summer, the Everglades’ salvation depended upon a plan voted into law in 2000 that has three key steps: dams and ditches would be removed, restoring some natural flow; Lake Okeechobee would be cleaned; and enormous reservoirs would be built to hold the lake’s runoff in the summer and pour water south in the dry months.

By last year, the 2000 plan had all but fizzled. The cost has soared from $7.8 billion to $10.9 billion, according to a report to Congress by the National Research Council. And the Army Corps has completed none of the draft’s 68 projects.

So last June, Florida Gov. Charlie Crist put all the projects on hold and announced that he had secretly negotiated with one of the Glades’ largest land owners, U.S. Sugar Corp. The company agreed to sell the state 187,000 acres for $1.7 billion. Last month, all the parties involved agreed on a final sale, scaled down to half size by the staggering economy.

Lost among the bitter fight over whether to buy sugar land are the fishermen who may lose their prized spot. On a recent afternoon, Persson and fishing partner Al Ovies cast into the shadows on a placid strip of the L-67A canal.

The pair make a convincing argument that undoing damage here doesn’t mean divorcing from the canals. Persson and Ovies met at a bass fishing club in the late 1980s. Dismayed about the restoration plan, they formed a coalition to save the canals in 2001 called South Florida Anglers for Everglades Restoration. They started attending South Florida Water District meetings and talking to corps officials.

“When we started going to meetings, I’m convinced a lot of these guys had no idea that anyone even fished these canals,” Ovies says. “They thought it was just a water conveyance they could get rid of and no one would miss.”

Ovies and Persson both agree that restoring the natural flow of water to Everglades National Park would be ideal. But both doubt that it’s possible. They worry that the corps will backfill one of the state’s premier fishing holes on an untested theory.

They’re not alone. Jon Fury, a biologist at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission since 1985, says he believes water flow to the Glades could be fixed by removing levees but leaving the canals intact.

Fury says he has found few places that match the L-67A as a fishery. By his math, the canal generates $1.1 million for Florida businesses every six months.

“To simply backfill these canals because it’s the easiest solution you see, I’d have to say hold on,” Fury says. “You’re going to ruin a really important fishery.”

But Tom Van Lent, an Everglades Foundation scientist, describes the L-67A and similar canals as “an artifact of what we’ve done to destroy the Everglades.” He is skeptical of any plan that would keep the canals. “Maybe we can have an occasional hole where bass can have a refuge,” Van Lent says. “But there’s not going to be the same access. You’re not going to be able to drive in from the city and launch your boat in 20 minutes from the dock right off the trail.”

That’s a tough pill to swallow for a man like Persson, who spent so many long languid afternoons on the canal with his dad, who died in 2005.

The old firefighter’s eyes are distant and glassy behind his sunglasses as he casts and reels, casts and reels, drifting down the same water he’s floated a thousand times before.

Suddenly, his arms go taught. Tendons flex out of his weathered flesh as his fishing line jerks hard. The line goes tight.

Persson jerks up, expertly driving the hook deeper into whatever’s fighting beneath the murky surface. He reels. A foot-long bass flips back and forth, fighting in the air.

This time, in this tiny conflict waged in a canal carved out of the swamps, man has won.

“Beautiful,” he says.

Till next time tight lines and good fishing….
From Bass Online Staff Writer
BassOnline.com / 888-829-BASS

BassOnline.com is Florida Fishing largest Freshwater Guide Service, specializing in Florida bass fishing in the Florida lakes, canals and rivers.

To learn more about Florida bass fishing, visit Bass Fishing Blog, Florida Bass Fishing, Lake Okeechobee Fishing, Florida Peacock Bass

Share

State Lawmakers Plan Sugar Land Hearing

Wednesday, December 10th, 2008

State lawmakers in Miami-Dade County are questioning the wisdom of the state’s planned $1.34 billion buyout of U.S. Sugar Corp.

A press release from state Rep. Juan Zapata, R-Miami, chairman of the Miami-Dade legislative delegation, said the delegation of lawmakers has serious concerns about the expense and effectiveness of the buyout, which is designed to restore a natural flow-way of water between Lake Okeechobee and the southern Everglades.

The lawmakers announced their own public hearing, to be held at 2 p.m., Wednesday, to gather input on the sale of land to the South Florida Water Management District.

The hearing will be at the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, 3790 N.W. 21st St., in Miami.

According to the press release, Zapata sent a letter expressing concerns and inviting water district officials to brief lawmakers. The district’s governing board is set to vote on the buyout Dec. 16. U.S. Sugar’s board approved the sale contract Monday.

“Although we are all supportive of the Everglades restoration and restoring its natural flow, several members have expressed serious doubt whether this is the correct action to take at this time,” Zapata said in the release.

State Rep. Erik Fresen, R-Miami, said in the release he has “grave concerns with the concept of an unelected board spending over $1 billion of taxpayer funds on land at a time when I’m having to tell social service, health care and education providers that we’re making major cuts that will affect our most vulnerable citizens.”

Meanwhile the U.S. Sugar board’s approval of the sale was blasted by The Lawrence Group of Tennessee, which has attempted to make a competing offer to buy the sugar giant in its entirety.

A press release from The Lawrence Group expressed “surprise and extreme disappointment at the announcement yesterday that the Board of Directors of United States Sugar Corporation had approved the contract.”

Till next time tight lines and good fishing….

From Staff and Wire Reports

BassOnline.com

Share

Canal weir may help return Alligator Alley drylands to wetlands

Saturday, July 12th, 2008

Water modification to improve Everglades and Miccosukee tribal lands

By Daily News staff

— Thousands of acres of wetlands will be returned to a more natural state through a project requested by the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida and supported by the South Florida Water Management District.

Construction of a water-control weir in the L-28 canal near Interstate 75 in Broward County will improve rainfall retention in the wetlands, re-hydrating about 8,000 acres within a triangular area bordered by I-75 and two canal levees, according to the water district. The SFWMD Governing Board this week approved $220,000 in additional funding for the project, on top of $600,000 previously approved in October 2007.

“This project represents cooperation between the district and the Miccosukee Tribe to benefit the Everglades and South Florida’s environment,” said SFWMD Governing Board Chairman Eric Buermann. “It is an opportunity to return another section of Everglades wetlands to a more natural state.”

The L-28 canal runs under Alligator Alley. A pump station moves water into the water conservation area but also has impacted drainage within the triangular wetland area. About 800 acres of the property is within the Big Cypress Preserve, while the rest is owned by the Tribe.

“The Miccosukee Tribe is voluntarily restoring over 8,000 acres of land, which could have been developed, back to the Everglades,” said Gene Duncan the Tribe’s water resources director.

Water managers and the Tribe believe the land will be improved by installing a weir in the canal south of the pump station, according to a water district news release. The device, a simple wall across the canal, will hold water in the triangle at depths closer to historical conditions but will allow water to flow north to the pump station during extremely wet times.

The Tribe is responsible for the final design, permitting, construction and monitoring of the project. The project is expected to be completed next year.

From Staff and Wire Reports
BassOnline.com

888-629-BASS (2277)
www.hawghunter.net

www.bassauthority.com
www.flpeacockbass.com
www.basson-line.com

Share

Everglades budget, scaled-back construction because of U.S. Sugar deal

Friday, July 11th, 2008

By Andy Reid |South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Doubling the budget for South Florida water managers and potentially shelving some Everglades restoration projects are among the ways proposed to pay for the state’s bid to buyout U.S. Sugar.

The South Florida Water Management District on Thursday revealed a plan for a $2.9 billion agency budget — up from the $1.3 billion expected — that includes paying for U.S. Sugar’s 187,000 acres, mill, offices and other holdings.

The budget boost comes from adding in costs for the $1.75 billion deal proposed to move the sugar giant out of the way in a plan to reconnect Lake Okeechobee to the Everglades.

“These are hard numbers to swallow, by us and the public,” district board member Charles Dauray said.

The district proposes taking on more debt to pay for the U.S. Sugar deal without increasing taxes.

The district’s governing board on Wednesday gave an initial endorsement to keeping property taxes about 62 cents per $1,000 of taxable value for most of its 16-county region. For a $150,000 home, factoring in a $50,000 homestead exemption, that would cost residents in Broward and Palm Beach counties $62.40 a year.

“We did it within our means,” district Executive Director Carol Ann Wehle said about the U.S. Sugar deal’s budget repercussions.

Doing so required “difficult decisions,” Wehle said. The preliminary budget proposal includes:

Continuing to suspend construction of a massive reservoir in western Palm Beach County. Since June, the district has been paying contractors $1.9 million a month to stand by while water managers decide whether to proceed. Taxpayers already have invested about $250 million in the 16,700-acre reservoir that was being built along U.S. 27.

Shrinking a much-anticipated reservoir and water treatment area east of Lake Okeechobee, planned to hold water that now gets drained to the coast with damaging environmental effects. What once was a 12,000-acre project would shrink to 8,000 acres.

Holding off on building a similar reservoir on the west side of the lake, calling on the federal government to take over construction.

As negotiations with U.S. Sugar continue, the district plans to spend the summer looking for ways to prioritize construction projects before giving final approval to a spending plan in September.

One of the biggest ticket items with a future that remains in doubt is the Everglades Agricultural Area reservoir in western Palm Beach County. The district in June stopped construction on it, citing a lingering legal challenge over how the water would be used. The agency must decide whether the reservoir — with a price tag projected to hit $800 million — is needed in the new plan to use U.S. Sugar land to store, treat and move water to the Everglades.

The Natural Resources Defense Council filed the legal challenge over the reservoir, seeking guarantees that the water would be used for Everglades restoration. On Thursday, the district’s governing board passed a resolution stating that whatever happens with the U.S. Sugar deal, the agency “remains committed to restoring the Everglades” and that “the District will ensure that water will be identified for the natural system.”

The U.S. Sugar deal calls for closing on the purchase by Nov. 30.

The district’s proposed budget comes up for a vote again on Sept. 10, with a final decision scheduled for Sept. 23.

From Staff and Wire Reports
BassOnline.com

888-629-BASS (2277)
www.hawghunter.net

www.bassauthority.com
www.flpeacockbass.com
www.basson-line.com

Share

Water managers get priorities straight, but what about the St. Johns River?

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Years from now, historians may look back upon the month recently concluded as the pivotal moment in the preservation and restoration of the Everglades.

Gov. Charlie Crist rocked the environmental world in late June when he announced a tentative deal with U.S. Sugar to purchase 187,000 acres south of Lake Okeechobee.

The deal, at a potential cost of $1.75 billion, has rekindled hopes of re-establishing the natural flow of water from Lake O to the River of Grass — a process everyone agrees is vital to restoring the Everglades.

The state’s deal with U.S. Sugar has garnered much of the attention — and rightfully so.

However, another event — less publicized but highly important — also occurred in June that bodes extremely well for Everglades restoration. Moreover, it provides keen insight into the new thinking required to preserve and reinvigorate the state’s fragile ecosystem.

Shortly before the deal was announced with U.S. Sugar, the South Florida Water Management District launched a new initiative: to reserve water for environmental needs — in particular, for fish and wildlife in the Kissimmee River north of Lake O.

Because water in the Kissimmee flows into the lake — and then is distributed throughout the region for a variety of uses — the district’s decision has significant implications for all of South Florida.

District officials have taken the precedent-setting step of establishing guidelines governing the allocation of water in the Kissimmee. As Chip Merriam, deputy executive director of water resources for SFWMD, wrote in a memo to board members:

“The district … is identifying river water for consumptive use and water for the protection of fish and wildlife. The water identified for the natural system may be protected through a water reservation as contemplated and authorized under state law.”

What does this mean? The river’s environmental needs may soon take precedence over agricultural and developmental needs. Additionally, the latter groups would be allowed to tap into this source only after the natural ecosystem has received an adequate supply of water.

This is a groundbreaking approach to water management. But this is how it should be.

Contrast this important policy change with the approach by the St. Johns River Water Management District — which has allowed water-intensive developments to imperil the St. Johns River — and you begin to grasp the far-reaching implications for the environment.

South Florida water managers are to be applauded for moving boldly in this direction. St. Johns managers need to get on board.

Stricter water-reservation rules are needed — in water districts throughout the state — to ensure this valuable resource is used first for environmental needs.

From Staff and Wire Reports
BassOnline.com

888-629-BASS (2277)
www.hawghunter.net

www.bassauthority.com
www.flpeacockbass.com
www.basson-line.com

Share